Skip to main content
4FactSake
Front PageYour FileInvestigateWar RoomSearchCasesPeopleInstitutions

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesPeopleInstitutionsThe ReceiptExcuses

Investigate

SearchInvestigateFor Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
  1. Municipalities
  2. Bela-Bela

Local Municipality

Bela-Bela

LP · Bela-BelaLP366

Waterberg District Municipality

No corruption incidents linked to this municipality on the 4FactSake archive yet. Live audit + finance data ships in Phase 2.

Category

Local Municipality

Province

LP

Documented incidents

0

Seat

Bela-Bela

  • Score
  • Leadership
  • Demographics
  • Water
  • Politics
  • Grants
  • Tenders
  • Trajectory
  • Financials
  • Budget
  • Debtors
  • Irregularities
Accountability IndexDraft

Composite 0–100 score (higher = better), from audit opinion, capex execution and linked incidents.

0/ 100Strained
Audit67%
50/100qualified
Capex—
n/acapex data not yet available
Incidents33%
100/100no incidents linked

Missing components (capex) excluded; remaining weights renormalised.

Leadership

Current municipal officials accountable for governance and finance, sourced from National Treasury.

Mayor

Cllr Gloria Modiegi Seleka

Selekag@belabela.gov.za

Municipal Manager

Mr Tsatsi George Ramagaga

RamagagaT@belabela.gov.za

Chief Financial Officer

Mr Lucas Tshepo Titi

titit@belabela.gov.za

Speaker

Mr Cllr Zakes Moeletsi

speaker@belabela.gov.za
Demographics — Census 2022

Per-capita normalisation lets us put the financial figures into human terms.

Population

64 306

Households

25 512

Unemployment

22.5%

Electricity83.5%
Piped water86.4%
Flush toilet79.5%
Refuse collected70.3%
Water — Blue / Green / No Drop

DWS scores measure Water Service Authorities. This local muni delegates water services to its district.

Water service is provided by Waterberg District Municipality. See that page for Blue / Green / No Drop scores.
Conditional grants (Treasury)

National + provincial grants flowing to this muni. Conditional grants are tied to specific outcomes — underspend is a red flag for delivery, not a saving.

Latest year

23/24

Adjusted budget

R112.6M

Actually spent

R89.0M

Unspent

R23.6M

Utilisation

79.0%Underspent

R89M spent
R24M unspent
79% spent21% unspent

Largest conditional grants — box size = budget, colour = utilisation

Box size = budget · colour = utilisation (green = spent, red = underspent, hollow = no data). Hover a grant.

Equitable Share (unconditional)

ESG·Local Government Equitable Share
no data
R129.6M budgeted·— spent

ESG is not a conditional grant — it can be spent at the muni's discretion. Shown for scale only.

Tender awards (eTender Publication Portal)

Cross-referenced against the Restricted Suppliers List on the award date.

No award notices on file for this municipality yet. Coverage expands as the operator transcribes from eTenders.gov.za.

Once awards are loaded, this panel surfaces every published contract awarded by the muni, with B-BBEE level, supplier registration, and a flag for any awards made to suppliers on the National Restricted Suppliers List.

Accountability trajectory · 2020 – 2026

The line traces the audit opinion (higher = cleaner); bars are irregular/fruitless/unauthorised expenditure, dots are documented incidents, and dashed markers are Section 139 interventions. Sustained decline rarely happens in a single bad year.

R33MR65MR98MR131M2020 UIFW · R84M · irregular R49M · fruitless R5M · unauthorised R30M2021 UIFW · R86M · irregular R14M · fruitless R834K · unauthorised R71M2022 UIFW · R131M · irregular R76M · fruitless R2M · unauthorised R53M2023 UIFW · R107M · irregular R67M · fruitless R4M · unauthorised R35M2024 UIFW · R85M · irregular R27M · fruitless R211K · unauthorised R58M2020 audit · Qualified2021 audit · Not submitted2022 audit · Qualified2023 audit · Qualified2024 audit · Qualified2020202120222023202420252026Clean auditQualifiedDisclaimer / adverseUIFW expenditure (bars)Documented incidentsSection 139 imposed
Financial Health — FY24/25

Cash position, solvency, and infrastructure-maintenance signal. Source: National Treasury cflow_v2 + financial_position_v2 + repmaint_v2.

Cash on hand

R52.9M

Net assets

R1.07B

Operating cash flow

—

Repairs & maintenance

R7.9M

National Treasury & AGSA

Public finance data ingested directly from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp).

Latest Audit Outcome — FY23/24

Qualified

Irregular
R26.5M
Fruitless
R211k
Unauthorised
R58.4M
AGSA report

Capital Spending — FY25/26

Original budgetR222.0M
Adjusted budgetR245.9M
Actual—

Treasury §71·76d agoTreasury MTREF·12d agoAGSA MFMA·today

Aged Balances — FY24/25

Receivables from ratepayers (debtors) and amounts owed to suppliers (creditors). Source: National Treasury aged_debtor_v2 + aged_creditor_v2 cubes.

Owed TO the muni (receivables)

R377.7M

R300.9M (80%) over 1 year — effectively uncollectable

Water
R64.1M
Electricity
R16.8M
Property rates
R131.9M

Owed BY the muni (creditors)

R58.8M

Bulk electricity(Eskom)
R33.3M
Bulk water
R327k
Trade
R25.1M
AGSA Material Irregularities

Section 4(3) MI register — specific findings the Auditor-General has flagged for active investigation, recommendations, or referral to law enforcement.

4 material irregularities on record

Material financial loss — notified 2023-04-02

Resolved

FY24/25

AGSA action:Resolved MI / Resolved in prior periods

Source

Material financial loss — notified 2023-03-31

Resolved

FY24/25

AGSA action:Resolved MI / Resolved in prior periods

Source

Likely substantial harm to general public — notified 2024-04-18

Recommendations Made

FY24/25

AGSA action:Appropriate action being taken to resolve MI / Appropriate actions - follow-up not yet due

Source

Likely substantial harm to general public — notified 2024-04-09

Recommendations Made

FY24/25

AGSA action:Appropriate action being taken to resolve MI / Appropriate actions - follow-up not yet due

Source

Methodology & sources

Live data from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp, aged_debtor_v2, aged_creditor_v2, cflow_v2, financial_position_v2, repmaint_v2, officials) and operator-curated AGSA Section 4(3) Material Irregularities, Stats SA Census, Cogta Section 139 intervention records, DWS Blue / Green / No Drop water-services audits, IEC Local Government Election results + political control history, and Treasury conditional grants (grants_v2) — allocation versus actual spend per grant. The Accountability Index methodology is a draft pending sensitivity testing — treat the score as a working signal, not a final verdict. It currently weighs three of four intended signals — audit opinion (50%), capital-budget execution (25%) and linked corruption incidents (25%); a fourth pillar, service delivery (Stats SA non-financial census), is not yet wired in. Where a signal is missing for a municipality, its weight is renormalised across the rest.