Skip to main content
4FactSake
Front PageYour FileInvestigateWar RoomSearchCasesPeopleInstitutions

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesPeopleInstitutionsThe ReceiptExcuses

Investigate

SearchInvestigateFor Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
  1. Municipalities
  2. Breede Valley

Local Municipality

Breede Valley

WC · WorcesterWC025

Cape Winelands District Municipality

No corruption incidents linked to this municipality on the 4FactSake archive yet. Live audit + finance data ships in Phase 2.

Category

Local Municipality

Province

WC

Documented incidents

0

Seat

Worcester

  • Score
  • Leadership
  • Demographics
  • Water
  • Politics
  • Grants
  • Tenders
  • Trajectory
  • Financials
  • Budget
  • Debtors
Accountability IndexDraft

Composite 0–100 score (higher = better), from audit opinion, capex execution and linked incidents.

0/ 100Functioning
Audit67%
100/100unqualified
Capex—
n/acapex data not yet available
Incidents33%
100/100no incidents linked

Missing components (capex) excluded; remaining weights renormalised.

Leadership

Current municipal officials accountable for governance and finance, sourced from National Treasury.

Mayor

Ms Ms Antoinette Steyn (DA)

asteyn@bvm.gov.za

Deputy Mayor

Mr Mr Jan Von Willingh (DA)

jvonwillingh@bvm.gov.za

Municipal Manager

Mr Mr David McThomas

dmcthomas@bvm.gov.za

Chief Financial Officer

Mr Mr Roddrick Ontong

rontong2@bvm.gov.za

Speaker

Mr N Mercuur (Neil)

nmercuur@bvm.gov.za
Demographics — Census 2022

Per-capita normalisation lets us put the financial figures into human terms.

Population

212 682

Households

51 624

Unemployment

14.4%

Electricity97.2%
Piped water94.8%
Flush toilet94.9%
Refuse collected85.9%
Water — Blue / Green / No Drop

DWS scores measure Water Service Authorities. This local muni delegates water services to its district.

Water service is provided by Cape Winelands District Municipality. See that page for Blue / Green / No Drop scores.
Conditional grants (Treasury)

National + provincial grants flowing to this muni. Conditional grants are tied to specific outcomes — underspend is a red flag for delivery, not a saving.

Latest year

23/24

Adjusted budget

R115.6M

Actually spent

R83.9M

Unspent

R31.8M

Utilisation

72.5%Underspent

R84M spent
R32M unspent
73% spent27% unspent

Largest conditional grants — box size = budget, colour = utilisation

Box size = budget · colour = utilisation (green = spent, red = underspent, hollow = no data). Hover a grant.

Equitable Share (unconditional)

ESG·Local Government Equitable Share
no data
R162.5M budgeted·— spent

ESG is not a conditional grant — it can be spent at the muni's discretion. Shown for scale only.

Tender awards (eTender Publication Portal)

Cross-referenced against the Restricted Suppliers List on the award date.

No award notices on file for this municipality yet. Coverage expands as the operator transcribes from eTenders.gov.za.

Once awards are loaded, this panel surfaces every published contract awarded by the muni, with B-BBEE level, supplier registration, and a flag for any awards made to suppliers on the National Restricted Suppliers List.

Accountability trajectory · 2020 – 2026

The line traces the audit opinion (higher = cleaner); bars are irregular/fruitless/unauthorised expenditure, dots are documented incidents, and dashed markers are Section 139 interventions. Sustained decline rarely happens in a single bad year.

R0R1R1R12020 audit · Clean2021 audit · Clean2022 audit · Clean2023 audit · Clean2024 audit · Clean2020202120222023202420252026Clean auditQualifiedDisclaimer / adverseUIFW expenditure (bars)Documented incidentsSection 139 imposed
Financial Health — FY24/25

Cash position, solvency, and infrastructure-maintenance signal. Source: National Treasury cflow_v2 + financial_position_v2 + repmaint_v2.

Cash on hand

R238.6M

Net assets

R2.47B

Operating cash flow

—

Repairs & maintenance

R93.2M

National Treasury & AGSA

Public finance data ingested directly from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp).

Latest Audit Outcome — FY23/24

Unqualified - No findings

Irregular
R0
Fruitless
R0
Unauthorised
R0
AGSA report

Capital Spending — FY25/26

Original budgetR389.2M
Adjusted budgetR426.2M
Actual—

Treasury §71·76d agoTreasury MTREF·12d agoAGSA MFMA·today

Aged Balances — FY24/25

Receivables from ratepayers (debtors) and amounts owed to suppliers (creditors). Source: National Treasury aged_debtor_v2 + aged_creditor_v2 cubes.

Owed TO the muni (receivables)

R329.3M

R196.5M (60%) over 1 year — effectively uncollectable

Water
R64.9M
Electricity
R26.2M
Property rates
R42.4M

Owed BY the muni (creditors)

R1

Bulk electricity(Eskom)
R0
Bulk water
R0
Trade
R0

Methodology & sources

Live data from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp, aged_debtor_v2, aged_creditor_v2, cflow_v2, financial_position_v2, repmaint_v2, officials) and operator-curated AGSA Section 4(3) Material Irregularities, Stats SA Census, Cogta Section 139 intervention records, DWS Blue / Green / No Drop water-services audits, IEC Local Government Election results + political control history, and Treasury conditional grants (grants_v2) — allocation versus actual spend per grant. The Accountability Index methodology is a draft pending sensitivity testing — treat the score as a working signal, not a final verdict. It currently weighs three of four intended signals — audit opinion (50%), capital-budget execution (25%) and linked corruption incidents (25%); a fourth pillar, service delivery (Stats SA non-financial census), is not yet wired in. Where a signal is missing for a municipality, its weight is renormalised across the rest.