Skip to main content
4FactSake
Front PageYour FileInvestigateWar RoomSearchCasesPeopleInstitutions

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesPeopleInstitutionsThe ReceiptExcuses

Investigate

SearchInvestigateFor Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
  1. Municipalities
  2. Dannhauser

Local Municipality

Dannhauser

KZN · DannhauserKZN254

Amajuba District Municipality

No corruption incidents linked to this municipality on the 4FactSake archive yet. Live audit + finance data ships in Phase 2.

Category

Local Municipality

Province

KZN

Documented incidents

0

Seat

Dannhauser

  • Score
  • Leadership
  • Demographics
  • Water
  • Politics
  • Grants
  • Tenders
  • Trajectory
  • Financials
  • Budget
  • Debtors
Accountability IndexDraft

Composite 0–100 score (higher = better), from audit opinion, capex execution and linked incidents.

0/ 100Functioning
Audit67%
80/100unqualified emphasis of matter
Capex—
n/acapex data not yet available
Incidents33%
100/100no incidents linked

Missing components (capex) excluded; remaining weights renormalised.

Leadership

Current municipal officials accountable for governance and finance, sourced from National Treasury.

Mayor

Cllr Bongani A Hadebe

mayor@dannhauser.gov.za

Deputy Mayor

Cllr Busisiwe T.D Langa

deputy_mayor@dannhauser.gov.za

Municipal Manager

Mr Mandlenkosi S Sithole

municipalmanager@dannhauser.gov.za

Chief Financial Officer

Mr Khehla Mdlalose

khehlam@dannhauser.gov.za

Speaker

Cllr Z.S. Ngubeni

speaker@dannhauser.gov.za
Demographics — Census 2022

Per-capita normalisation lets us put the financial figures into human terms.

Population

142 750

Households

20 710

Unemployment

47.6%

Electricity93.9%
Piped water69.0%
Flush toilet23.8%
Refuse collected21.9%
Water — Blue / Green / No Drop

DWS scores measure Water Service Authorities. This local muni delegates water services to its district.

Water service is provided by Amajuba District Municipality. See that page for Blue / Green / No Drop scores.
Conditional grants (Treasury)

National + provincial grants flowing to this muni. Conditional grants are tied to specific outcomes — underspend is a red flag for delivery, not a saving.

Latest year

23/24

Adjusted budget

R55.4M

Actually spent

R36.5M

Unspent

R18.9M

Utilisation

65.9%Underspent

R37M spent
R19M unspent
66% spent34% unspent

Largest conditional grants — box size = budget, colour = utilisation

Box size = budget · colour = utilisation (green = spent, red = underspent, hollow = no data). Hover a grant.

Equitable Share (unconditional)

ESG·Local Government Equitable Share
no data
R114.8M budgeted·— spent

ESG is not a conditional grant — it can be spent at the muni's discretion. Shown for scale only.

Tender awards (eTender Publication Portal)

Cross-referenced against the Restricted Suppliers List on the award date.

No award notices on file for this municipality yet. Coverage expands as the operator transcribes from eTenders.gov.za.

Once awards are loaded, this panel surfaces every published contract awarded by the muni, with B-BBEE level, supplier registration, and a flag for any awards made to suppliers on the National Restricted Suppliers List.

Accountability trajectory · 2020 – 2026

The line traces the audit opinion (higher = cleaner); bars are irregular/fruitless/unauthorised expenditure, dots are documented incidents, and dashed markers are Section 139 interventions. Sustained decline rarely happens in a single bad year.

R29MR57MR86MR115M2020 UIFW · R9M · irregular R8M · unauthorised R521K2021 UIFW · R22M · irregular R22M2022 UIFW · R115M · irregular R76M · fruitless R400K · unauthorised R38M2023 UIFW · R69M · irregular R4M · fruitless R34K · unauthorised R65M2024 UIFW · R55M · irregular R26M · fruitless R82K · unauthorised R29M2020 audit · Qualified2021 audit · Qualified2022 audit · Clean (with caveat)2023 audit · Clean (with caveat)2024 audit · Clean (with caveat)2020202120222023202420252026Clean auditQualifiedDisclaimer / adverseUIFW expenditure (bars)Documented incidentsSection 139 imposed

Audit opinion has improved over the period.

Financial Health — FY24/25

Cash position, solvency, and infrastructure-maintenance signal. Source: National Treasury cflow_v2 + financial_position_v2 + repmaint_v2.

Cash on hand

R20.6M

Net assets

R539.5M

Operating cash flow

—

Repairs & maintenance

R30.5M

National Treasury & AGSA

Public finance data ingested directly from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp).

Latest Audit Outcome — FY23/24

Unqualified - Emphasis of Matter items

Irregular
R26.4M
Fruitless
R82k
Unauthorised
R28.8M
AGSA report

Capital Spending — FY25/26

Original budgetR127.0M
Adjusted budgetR95.2M
Actual—

Treasury §71·76d agoTreasury MTREF·12d agoAGSA MFMA·today

Aged Balances — FY24/25

Receivables from ratepayers (debtors) and amounts owed to suppliers (creditors). Source: National Treasury aged_debtor_v2 + aged_creditor_v2 cubes.

Owed TO the muni (receivables)

R99.0M

R81.8M (83%) over 1 year — effectively uncollectable

Water
R94
Electricity
R0
Property rates
R85.1M

Owed BY the muni (creditors)

R0

Bulk electricity(Eskom)
R0
Bulk water
R0
Trade
R0

Methodology & sources

Live data from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp, aged_debtor_v2, aged_creditor_v2, cflow_v2, financial_position_v2, repmaint_v2, officials) and operator-curated AGSA Section 4(3) Material Irregularities, Stats SA Census, Cogta Section 139 intervention records, DWS Blue / Green / No Drop water-services audits, IEC Local Government Election results + political control history, and Treasury conditional grants (grants_v2) — allocation versus actual spend per grant. The Accountability Index methodology is a draft pending sensitivity testing — treat the score as a working signal, not a final verdict. It currently weighs three of four intended signals — audit opinion (50%), capital-budget execution (25%) and linked corruption incidents (25%); a fourth pillar, service delivery (Stats SA non-financial census), is not yet wired in. Where a signal is missing for a municipality, its weight is renormalised across the rest.