Skip to main content
4FactSake
Front PageYour FileInvestigateWar RoomSearchCasesPeopleInstitutions

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesPeopleInstitutionsThe ReceiptExcuses

Investigate

SearchInvestigateFor Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
  1. Municipalities
  2. Dr Beyers Naudé

Local Municipality

Dr Beyers Naudé

EC · Graaff-ReinetEC101

Sarah Baartman District Municipality

No corruption incidents linked to this municipality on the 4FactSake archive yet. Live audit + finance data ships in Phase 2.

Category

Local Municipality

Province

EC

Documented incidents

0

Seat

Graaff-Reinet

  • Score
  • Leadership
  • Demographics
  • Water
  • Politics
  • Grants
  • Tenders
  • Trajectory
  • Financials
  • Budget
  • Debtors
  • Irregularities
Accountability IndexDraft

Composite 0–100 score (higher = better), from audit opinion, capex execution and linked incidents.

0/ 100Functioning
Audit67%
80/100unqualified emphasis of matter
Capex—
n/acapex data not yet available
Incidents33%
100/100no incidents linked

Missing components (capex) excluded; remaining weights renormalised.

Leadership

Current municipal officials accountable for governance and finance, sourced from National Treasury.

Mayor

Mr Willem Safers

willemsafers@gmail.com

Municipal Manager

Dr Edward Martin Rankwana

mm@bnlm.gov.za

Chief Financial Officer

Mr Jimmy Joubert

joubertj@bnlm.gov.za

Speaker

Ms Thembisa Nonnies

nonniest987@gmail.com
Demographics — Census 2022

Per-capita normalisation lets us put the financial figures into human terms.

Population

101 001

Households

21 455

Unemployment

29.4%

Electricity97.3%
Piped water98.1%
Flush toilet96.1%
Refuse collected90.0%
Water — Blue / Green / No Drop

DWS scores measure Water Service Authorities. This local muni delegates water services to its district.

Water service is provided by Sarah Baartman District Municipality. See that page for Blue / Green / No Drop scores.
Conditional grants (Treasury)

National + provincial grants flowing to this muni. Conditional grants are tied to specific outcomes — underspend is a red flag for delivery, not a saving.

Latest year

23/24

Adjusted budget

R101.4M

Actually spent

R62.8M

Unspent

R38.6M

Utilisation

62.0%Underspent

R63M spent
R39M unspent
62% spent38% unspent

Largest conditional grants — box size = budget, colour = utilisation

Box size = budget · colour = utilisation (green = spent, red = underspent, hollow = no data). Hover a grant.

Equitable Share (unconditional)

ESG·Local Government Equitable Share
no data
R114.4M budgeted·— spent

ESG is not a conditional grant — it can be spent at the muni's discretion. Shown for scale only.

Tender awards (eTender Publication Portal)

Cross-referenced against the Restricted Suppliers List on the award date.

No award notices on file for this municipality yet. Coverage expands as the operator transcribes from eTenders.gov.za.

Once awards are loaded, this panel surfaces every published contract awarded by the muni, with B-BBEE level, supplier registration, and a flag for any awards made to suppliers on the National Restricted Suppliers List.

Accountability trajectory · 2020 – 2026

The line traces the audit opinion (higher = cleaner); bars are irregular/fruitless/unauthorised expenditure, dots are documented incidents, and dashed markers are Section 139 interventions. Sustained decline rarely happens in a single bad year.

R90MR179MR269MR358M2020 UIFW · R195M · irregular R103M · fruitless R8M · unauthorised R83M2021 UIFW · R91M · irregular R29M · fruitless R18M · unauthorised R44M2022 UIFW · R272M · irregular R190M · fruitless R21M · unauthorised R61M2023 UIFW · R358M · irregular R204M · fruitless R48M · unauthorised R106M2024 UIFW · R215M · irregular R62M · fruitless R56M · unauthorised R98M2020 audit · Qualified2021 audit · Qualified2022 audit · Qualified2023 audit · Clean (with caveat)2024 audit · Clean (with caveat)2020202120222023202420252026Clean auditQualifiedDisclaimer / adverseUIFW expenditure (bars)Documented incidentsSection 139 imposed

Audit opinion has improved over the period.

Financial Health — FY24/25

Cash position, solvency, and infrastructure-maintenance signal. Source: National Treasury cflow_v2 + financial_position_v2 + repmaint_v2.

Cash on hand

R27.8M

Net assets

R449.8M

Operating cash flow

—

Repairs & maintenance

R53.5M

National Treasury & AGSA

Public finance data ingested directly from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp).

Latest Audit Outcome — FY23/24

Unqualified - Emphasis of Matter items

Irregular
R61.8M
Fruitless
R55.6M
Unauthorised
R98.0M
AGSA report

Capital Spending — FY25/26

Original budgetR228.0M
Adjusted budgetR188.3M
Actual—

Treasury §71·76d agoTreasury MTREF·12d agoAGSA MFMA·today

Aged Balances — FY24/25

Receivables from ratepayers (debtors) and amounts owed to suppliers (creditors). Source: National Treasury aged_debtor_v2 + aged_creditor_v2 cubes.

Owed TO the muni (receivables)

R512.0M

R62.4M (12%) over 1 year — effectively uncollectable

Water
R136.8M
Electricity
R20.1M
Property rates
R83.7M

Owed BY the muni (creditors)

R482.5M

Bulk electricity(Eskom)
R379.7M
Bulk water
R0
Trade
R78.6M
AGSA Material Irregularities

Section 4(3) MI register — specific findings the Auditor-General has flagged for active investigation, recommendations, or referral to law enforcement.

3 material irregularities on record

Likely material financial loss — notified 2022-01-20

Resolved

FY24/25

AGSA action:Resolved MI / Resolved in prior periods

Source

Material financial loss — notified 2022-01-31

Resolved

FY24/25

AGSA action:Resolved MI / Resolved in prior periods

Source

Substantial harm to general public — notified 2024-11-26

Recommendations Made

FY24/25

AGSA action:Appropriate action being taken to resolve MI / Appropriate actions - assessing implementation information

Source

Methodology & sources

Live data from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp, aged_debtor_v2, aged_creditor_v2, cflow_v2, financial_position_v2, repmaint_v2, officials) and operator-curated AGSA Section 4(3) Material Irregularities, Stats SA Census, Cogta Section 139 intervention records, DWS Blue / Green / No Drop water-services audits, IEC Local Government Election results + political control history, and Treasury conditional grants (grants_v2) — allocation versus actual spend per grant. The Accountability Index methodology is a draft pending sensitivity testing — treat the score as a working signal, not a final verdict. It currently weighs three of four intended signals — audit opinion (50%), capital-budget execution (25%) and linked corruption incidents (25%); a fourth pillar, service delivery (Stats SA non-financial census), is not yet wired in. Where a signal is missing for a municipality, its weight is renormalised across the rest.