Skip to main content
4FactSake
Front PageYour FileInvestigateWar RoomSearchCasesPeopleInstitutions

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesPeopleInstitutionsThe ReceiptExcuses

Investigate

SearchInvestigateFor Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
  1. Municipalities
  2. Sedibeng

District Municipality

Sedibeng

GP · VereenigingDC42

No corruption incidents linked to this municipality on the 4FactSake archive yet. Live audit + finance data ships in Phase 2.

Category

District Municipality

Province

GP

Documented incidents

0

Seat

Vereeniging

  • Score
  • Leadership
  • Water
  • Politics
  • Grants
  • Tenders
  • Trajectory
  • Financials
  • Budget
  • Debtors
Accountability IndexDraft

Composite 0–100 score (higher = better), from audit opinion, capex execution and linked incidents.

0/ 100Functioning
Audit67%
80/100unqualified emphasis of matter
Capex—
n/acapex data not yet available
Incidents33%
100/100no incidents linked

Missing components (capex) excluded; remaining weights renormalised.

Local municipalities in this district

Each Category B local municipality below sits under this district.

Emfuleni

GT421 · Vanderbijlpark

Lesedi

GT423 · Heidelberg

Midvaal

GT422 · Meyerton

Leadership

Current municipal officials accountable for governance and finance, sourced from National Treasury.

Mayor

Ms Lerato Maloka

mapulengm@sedibeng.gov.za

Municipal Manager

Mr Fairbridge Motsumi Mathe

motsumim@sedibeng.gov.za

Chief Financial Officer

Ms Mathapelo Masisi

mathapelom@sedibeng.gov.za

Speaker

Ms MM Gomba

JackyM@sedibeng.gov.za
Conditional grants (Treasury)

National + provincial grants flowing to this muni. Conditional grants are tied to specific outcomes — underspend is a red flag for delivery, not a saving.

Latest year

23/24

Adjusted budget

R24.0M

Actually spent

R5.1M

Unspent

R18.9M

Utilisation

21.3%Critical underspend

R5M spent
R19M unspent
21% spent79% unspent

Largest conditional grants — box size = budget, colour = utilisation

Box size = budget · colour = utilisation (green = spent, red = underspent, hollow = no data). Hover a grant.

Equitable Share (unconditional)

ESG·Local Government Equitable Share
no data
R303.3M budgeted·— spent

ESG is not a conditional grant — it can be spent at the muni's discretion. Shown for scale only.

Tender awards (eTender Publication Portal)

Cross-referenced against the Restricted Suppliers List on the award date.

No award notices on file for this municipality yet. Coverage expands as the operator transcribes from eTenders.gov.za.

Once awards are loaded, this panel surfaces every published contract awarded by the muni, with B-BBEE level, supplier registration, and a flag for any awards made to suppliers on the National Restricted Suppliers List.

Accountability trajectory · 2020 – 2026

The line traces the audit opinion (higher = cleaner); bars are irregular/fruitless/unauthorised expenditure, dots are documented incidents, and dashed markers are Section 139 interventions. Sustained decline rarely happens in a single bad year.

R15MR30MR45MR60M2020 UIFW · R17M · irregular R15M · unauthorised R1M2021 UIFW · R60M · irregular R38M · unauthorised R22M2022 UIFW · R46M · irregular R42M · fruitless R528K · unauthorised R3M2023 UIFW · R25M · irregular R21M · unauthorised R5M2024 UIFW · R37M · irregular R19M · unauthorised R18M2020 audit · Clean (with caveat)2021 audit · Clean (with caveat)2022 audit · Clean (with caveat)2023 audit · Clean (with caveat)2024 audit · Clean (with caveat)2020202120222023202420252026Clean auditQualifiedDisclaimer / adverseUIFW expenditure (bars)Documented incidentsSection 139 imposed
Financial Health — FY24/25

Cash position, solvency, and infrastructure-maintenance signal. Source: National Treasury cflow_v2 + financial_position_v2 + repmaint_v2.

Cash on hand

R59.2M

Net assets

R-31.8M

⚠ Technically insolvent

Operating cash flow

—

Repairs & maintenance

R7.8M

National Treasury & AGSA

Public finance data ingested directly from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp).

Latest Audit Outcome — FY23/24

Unqualified - Emphasis of Matter items

Irregular
R19.1M
Fruitless
R0
Unauthorised
R18.3M
AGSA report

Capital Spending — FY25/26

Original budgetR16.0M
Adjusted budgetR15.7M
Actual—

Treasury §71·76d agoTreasury MTREF·12d agoAGSA MFMA·today

Aged Balances — FY24/25

Receivables from ratepayers (debtors) and amounts owed to suppliers (creditors). Source: National Treasury aged_debtor_v2 + aged_creditor_v2 cubes.

Owed TO the muni (receivables)

R2.2M

R954k (44%) over 1 year — effectively uncollectable

Water
R0
Electricity
R0
Property rates
R0

Owed BY the muni (creditors)

R126.7M

Bulk electricity(Eskom)
R0
Bulk water
R0
Trade
R3.0M

Methodology & sources

Live data from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp, aged_debtor_v2, aged_creditor_v2, cflow_v2, financial_position_v2, repmaint_v2, officials) and operator-curated AGSA Section 4(3) Material Irregularities, Stats SA Census, Cogta Section 139 intervention records, DWS Blue / Green / No Drop water-services audits, IEC Local Government Election results + political control history, and Treasury conditional grants (grants_v2) — allocation versus actual spend per grant. The Accountability Index methodology is a draft pending sensitivity testing — treat the score as a working signal, not a final verdict. It currently weighs three of four intended signals — audit opinion (50%), capital-budget execution (25%) and linked corruption incidents (25%); a fourth pillar, service delivery (Stats SA non-financial census), is not yet wired in. Where a signal is missing for a municipality, its weight is renormalised across the rest.