Skip to main content
4FactSake
Front PageYour FileInvestigateWar RoomSearchCasesPeopleInstitutions

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesPeopleInstitutionsThe ReceiptExcuses

Investigate

SearchInvestigateFor Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
  1. Municipalities
  2. Oudtshoorn

Local Municipality

Oudtshoorn

R0

Total value of 1 documented incidents

WC · OudtshoornWC045

Garden Route District Municipality

Category

Local Municipality

Province

WC

Documented incidents

1

Seat

Oudtshoorn

  • Score
  • Incidents
  • Leadership
  • Demographics
  • Water
  • Politics
  • Grants
  • Tenders
  • Trajectory
  • Financials
  • Budget
  • Debtors
Accountability IndexDraft

Composite 0–100 score (higher = better), from audit opinion, capex execution and linked incidents.

0/ 100Functioning
Audit67%
80/100unqualified emphasis of matter
Capex—
n/acapex data not yet available
Incidents33%
80/1001 incident on record

Missing components (capex) excluded; remaining weights renormalised.

Linked incidents

Corruption incidents documented in the 4FactSake archive and linked to this municipality.

Municipal Collapse2015

Oudtshoorn: Two Section 139 Interventions, Forensic Probe Finds 132 Contraventions Including Fraud and Corruption

DocumentedZuma EraDisciplinary

Leadership

Current municipal officials accountable for governance and finance, sourced from National Treasury.

Mayor

Cllr M Tyatya

mziwoxolo@oudtmun.gov.za

Deputy Mayor

Cllr V Michaels

veronica@oudtmun.gov.za

Municipal Manager

Mr M. Yekani

mm@oudtmun.gov.za

Chief Financial Officer

Mr GP De Jager

cfo@oudtmun.gov.za

Speaker

Cllr Julia Le Roux Krowitz

jones@oudtmun.gov.za
Demographics — Census 2022

Per-capita normalisation lets us put the financial figures into human terms.

Population

138 257

Households

24 716

Unemployment

25.3%

Electricity92.3%
Piped water93.4%
Flush toilet88.5%
Refuse collected89.2%
Water — Blue / Green / No Drop

DWS scores measure Water Service Authorities. This local muni delegates water services to its district.

Water service is provided by Garden Route District Municipality. See that page for Blue / Green / No Drop scores.
Conditional grants (Treasury)

National + provincial grants flowing to this muni. Conditional grants are tied to specific outcomes — underspend is a red flag for delivery, not a saving.

Latest year

23/24

Adjusted budget

R135.8M

Actually spent

R113.0M

Unspent

R22.8M

Utilisation

83.2%Mostly spent

R113M spent
R23M unspent
83% spent17% unspent

Largest conditional grants — box size = budget, colour = utilisation

Box size = budget · colour = utilisation (green = spent, red = underspent, hollow = no data). Hover a grant.

Equitable Share (unconditional)

ESG·Local Government Equitable Share
no data
R96.4M budgeted·— spent

ESG is not a conditional grant — it can be spent at the muni's discretion. Shown for scale only.

Tender awards (eTender Publication Portal)

Cross-referenced against the Restricted Suppliers List on the award date.

No award notices on file for this municipality yet. Coverage expands as the operator transcribes from eTenders.gov.za.

Once awards are loaded, this panel surfaces every published contract awarded by the muni, with B-BBEE level, supplier registration, and a flag for any awards made to suppliers on the National Restricted Suppliers List.

Accountability trajectory · 2020 – 2026

The line traces the audit opinion (higher = cleaner); bars are irregular/fruitless/unauthorised expenditure, dots are documented incidents, and dashed markers are Section 139 interventions. Sustained decline rarely happens in a single bad year.

R8MR15MR23MR31M2020 UIFW · R27M · irregular R27M2021 UIFW · R25M · irregular R25M2022 UIFW · R31M · irregular R10M · unauthorised R21M2023 UIFW · R5M · irregular R5M2024 UIFW · R26M · irregular R26M2020 audit · Clean (with caveat)2021 audit · Clean (with caveat)2022 audit · Clean (with caveat)2023 audit · Clean2024 audit · Clean (with caveat)2020202120222023202420252026Clean auditQualifiedDisclaimer / adverseUIFW expenditure (bars)Documented incidentsSection 139 imposed
Financial Health — FY24/25

Cash position, solvency, and infrastructure-maintenance signal. Source: National Treasury cflow_v2 + financial_position_v2 + repmaint_v2.

Cash on hand

R177.7M

Net assets

R1.08B

Operating cash flow

—

Repairs & maintenance

R22.6M

National Treasury & AGSA

Public finance data ingested directly from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp).

Latest Audit Outcome — FY23/24

Unqualified - Emphasis of Matter items

Irregular
R25.9M
Fruitless
R0
Unauthorised
R0
AGSA report

Capital Spending — FY25/26

Original budgetR168.5M
Adjusted budgetR188.4M
Actual—

Treasury §71·76d agoTreasury MTREF·12d agoAGSA MFMA·today

Aged Balances — FY24/25

Receivables from ratepayers (debtors) and amounts owed to suppliers (creditors). Source: National Treasury aged_debtor_v2 + aged_creditor_v2 cubes.

Owed TO the muni (receivables)

R167.9M

R68.2M (41%) over 1 year — effectively uncollectable

Water
R29.3M
Electricity
R37.9M
Property rates
R53.2M

Owed BY the muni (creditors)

R0

Bulk electricity(Eskom)
R0
Bulk water
R0
Trade
R0

Methodology & sources

Live data from National Treasury cubes (incexp_v2, capital_v2, audit_opinions, uifwexp, aged_debtor_v2, aged_creditor_v2, cflow_v2, financial_position_v2, repmaint_v2, officials) and operator-curated AGSA Section 4(3) Material Irregularities, Stats SA Census, Cogta Section 139 intervention records, DWS Blue / Green / No Drop water-services audits, IEC Local Government Election results + political control history, and Treasury conditional grants (grants_v2) — allocation versus actual spend per grant. The Accountability Index methodology is a draft pending sensitivity testing — treat the score as a working signal, not a final verdict. It currently weighs three of four intended signals — audit opinion (50%), capital-budget execution (25%) and linked corruption incidents (25%); a fourth pillar, service delivery (Stats SA non-financial census), is not yet wired in. Where a signal is missing for a municipality, its weight is renormalised across the rest.