Skip to main content
4FactSake
Pheji ya le MahlweniFayili ya wenaLavisisaWar RoomLavaTimhakaVanhuTihuvo

Stay informed

Get notified when new evidence is published.

4FactSake

A searchable, cross-referenced public database of state failure and corruption in South Africa. Every claim sourced. Every person linked. Every excuse documented.

This is not an opinion platform. It is a forensic record. The facts speak for themselves.

Explore

CasesVanhuInstitutionsThe ReceiptSwikhonekelo

Investigate

SearchInvestigateEka Media

© 2026 4FactSake. All data publicly sourced.

MethodologyCorrectionsBuilt with evidence, not opinions.
How we work

Methodology

This is not an opinion platform. Every claim is graded, attributed and traceable to a source. This page shows how — and shows our work on the one number people check first.


The evidence ladder

Every incident carries an evidence strength. The four tiers are a legal shield as much as an editorial one: a claim is only ever stated as strongly as its weakest verifiable source allows.

1Alleged

alleged

A claim has been made — in a complaint, a media report or a filing — but no independent body has yet tested it. We record it as alleged and attribute it. It is never presented as fact.

2Reported

reported

Documented by a credible outlet or more than one independent source, but not yet the subject of a formal finding. Stronger than a single allegation; short of an official conclusion.

3Documented

documented

Established in a formal document — an Auditor-General report, an SIU or PSC finding, a commission of inquiry, a parliamentary reply. A body with a mandate has put it on the record.

4Proven

proven

Tested and upheld by a court, or admitted. The highest tier. Reserved for findings that have survived legal or judicial scrutiny.

What counts as a source

We prioritise primary, on-the-record documents: Auditor-General reports, court judgments, National Prosecuting Authority and Special Investigating Unit findings, Public Service Commission and DPSA records, commission-of-inquiry evidence, and parliamentary questions and replies. Secondary reporting is used to establish that something is reported, and is labelled as such — it never on its own lifts a claim to documented or proven. Every source is attached to the record it supports, with a specific reference, so any reader can go and check it.

How the figures are calculated

Financial figures are the amounts named in the underlying sources — the value of a contract, the quantum of a loss, the sum an official body put on the record. Where a source gives a range, we record the range. Where an amount is disputed or undisclosed, we say so rather than estimate.

Deduplication — why totals aren’t double-counted

Large scandals are often recorded both as a single umbrella case and as several component cases. If we simply added every amount together, the umbrella and its children would each be counted — inflating the total. So the headline figure sums only top-level (umbrella and standalone) incidents; component incidents that roll up into a parent are excluded from the total, though they remain fully browsable. This is done in the database, against the incident’s parent reference, so the number cannot silently drift.

R5.4 trillion

deduplicated total

226

top-level cases

221

persons

711

sources

These figures are read live from the database, not typed by hand — so this page, the homepage and the share cards always agree.

When we get it wrong

A database this size will contain errors. We would rather find and fix them in the open than pretend they don’t exist. Every correction we make is logged, dated and public.

Read the corrections log →